Perfect eclipse quantum numbers QUANTUM NUMBER COUNTS Here are the flex property 'quantum numbers' that have counts in WHOLE INTEGER units of inward progressions from the Moon's mean of orbit, in quick lists to summarize them; as thus: 1. VENUS-VENUS-SUN states An eclipser etheric Venus at Earth, eclipses an etheric Sun, in Venus orbit. Each gap is of Venus radii size. The inward offset progression is: | eyepiece ...... - 5 - 4 - 3 moon mean orbit | focal area |.......| one Venus diameter of Averaged size. 2. MERCURY-MERCURY-SUN states An eclipser etheric Mercury at Venus, eclipses a real Sun at the center of the solar system. Each gap is of Mercury radii size. This progression in fact is also shifted in an offset by one radius of the Earth's Moon added to the Mean of the Moon's orbit. Characteristically this system is synomous with the Earth-Moon system in that both perfectly eclipse the Sun at the solar system center, and both have a + 1 Moon radii. The inward offset progression is: .....|... eyepiece ...... - 4 - 3 - 2 | + 1 moon radius | focal area |.......| one Mercury diameter of Averaged size. 3. EARTH-MOON-SUN (empirical) An eclipser real Moon at Earth, eclipses a real Sun at the center of the solar system. Each gap is of Earth radii size. The sequence starts one Moon radii advanced outward beyond the Moon's mean of orbit, it is offset outwardly by a unit equal to one radius of the Moon. The inward offset progression is: ....|... eyepiece ...... - 3 - 2 - 1 | + 1 Moon radii | focal area |.......| one Earth diameter of Averaged size. 4. EARTH-VENUS-SUN An eclipser real planet Earth at Earth, eclipses an etheric Sun in Venus orbit. Each flex gap is of Venus radii size. The inward offset progression is: | eyepiece ...... - 2 - 1 - 0 .... moon mean orbit | focal area |.......| one Venus diameter of Averaged size. _________________________________________________________________________ Lets take a closer look at what these quantum numbers say. We can use the pictogram for the MERCURY-MERCURY-SUN states as a good test case: .....|... eyepiece ...... - 4 - 3 - 2 | + 1 moon radius | focal area |.......| one Mercury diameter of Averaged size. (INTERPRETATION) In truth, quantum number pictograms such as the above are slightly misleading, in that it is a complete set of quantum numbers for just spacial displacements. The numbers do not represent the distance actually moved by quantal displacements, ie the 'diameter' formed by the shifting focal lens, which abides within the quantum numbers. DIAMETERS In actual fact, the Moon called Mercury only displaces by two radii hops, totalling a full diameter distance. How the quantum numbers, and the gap itself, relate, is that the first image of Mercury as a 'focal lens' appears miraged at a location distanced as a Moon radius equivalent excremented (+ 1 Mr)(1 radius of our own Moon) on the outside of the Moon orbit MEAN, shifted then two Mercury radii back toward Venus in orbit, to quantum location number (- 2), to then shift by two more quantum increments further inward, in actual focal lens starting as a sphere of Polar radius and finally flexing into a sphere with a radius of Equatorial size. The gap actually shifted in direct focusing equals a single diameter for Mercury, even though four radii increments end up being shown by the quantum numbers. In fact however, from start position (- 2), Mercury only displaces in focus by two radii units in total, to finalize at the (- 4) position. The distance of actual focus can be idiogrammed as: Polar radius ( x 2 ) Averaged radius ( x 3 ) Equatorial radius ( x 4 ) |... Moon Mean orbit | ........ | ........ | 0 + 1 Moon eq radius - 4 - 3 - 2 | ave radius polar radius Mercury Average diameter for recurring focal lens objects of Mercury sizes, as Venus shifts from Perhilion to Aphelion position in orbit, in which at start position ( - 2 ) two Polar radii from ( 0 + 1 Mr), Mercury is a focal lens of Polar radius, then shifts to ( - 3 ) three radii from ( 0 + 1 Mr ), to become a focal lens of Averaged radius, then shifts once more to ( - 4 ) four radii from ( 0 + 1 Mr), to become a focal lens of Equatorial radius. Note that Mercury only actually shifted two increments as a focal lens itself, the two increments comprising one sphere of full diameter. But the sphere was shaped as a Polar radius on the far side, and an Equatorial radius on the close side, hence the total cross section of the sphere is 1 full diameter of Averaged size, cammed off-centered in a very minor shift inward by the oblative difference between the polar and equatorial radius of Mercury. If this seems a bit hazy it is only because of the surreal mental gymnastics in virtual realities needed to perceive several different attributes occurring at once, inside the quantum numbers. Hints of sub-atomic particle physics are de jevu-ing around these thoughts, incidentally. DIAMETER QUANTUM NUMBERS It is possible to open up pictographs within the idiograms to further specify the 'diameter' part as other quantum numbers, but such subset quantum numbers will be uniformly as the same for the four inner Terran eclipse systems, in which 1 full diameter is the total actual displacement of the focal lens in action. The same 'gap size' vrs 'gap location' differentation is fundamental in every one of the four inward progressing perfect eclipse state systems, yielding one planetary diameter of average size as the whole incremental shift through the flexing 'gap', per system. Except for Mars. In the case of Mars, the actual displacement of Mars as the focal lens is 4 full Mars diameters of Average size. Mars is idiogrammed further below in IDEOGRAM 1. _________________________________________________________________________ VENUS HAS BALLS Lets take a closer look at what the quantum numbers say about the planet Venus. Planet Venus shows up 'twice' in flex increments defining precise locations of an 'eclipser', metaphysically miraged as etheric bodies that hop skip and jump through precise increments of space in the orbit of the Earth's Moon. What can be seen, that is uniquely definative about these two difference occurrences of 'flexes' as Venus; slices of space precisely the radii sizes of Venus. Quit a bit. In fact, a re-assuring confident mathematical progression is seen at once. The 'flex' qunatum numbers for the two different systems, SYSTEM 1, and SYSTEM 4, form a single lineal series of quantum numbers for 'flex', linking the two sequences into one sequence of five states. Here is how: SYSTEM 1 VENUS-VENUS-SUN states. (Venus eclipses the Sun) | eyepiece ...... - 5 - 4 - 3 ...... moon mean orbit | Venus flex increments SYSTEM 4 EARTH-VENUS-SUN states. (Earth eclipses the Sun) | eyepiece ...... - 2 - 1 - 0 .... moon mean orbit | Venus flex increments HOW OBVIOUS CAN IT GET ! | eyepiece ...... - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 .... moon mean orbit | Venus diameter Venus diameter SYSTEM 1 + SYSTEM 4 = [...:...] [...:...] Increments of flex | | equal to multiples EQ | | EQ | | of x 5 to x 0 O | O | of Venus radii, in a PR - single lineal series. Venus flex increments in side by side hyperfine progression of Venus 'equatorial' to 'polar' radii. _________________________________________________________________________ However, the above is a single lineal straight line incremental sequence, within a larger interface sequencing of quantum numbers. Lets now look at the larger picture. As shown in all of the quantum number idiograms above, there is a consistent flow of integer unit numbers. Consistancy is also shown in the direction the numbers lineally progress, in which all intervals have a minus value (in subtraction from the Moon's mean of orbit, bringing the focal lens closer to the observer, on the inside of the moon orbital Mean). This is a dominant feature in the quantizing of the progressions in the eclipse states. The progressions are not random sorts, there is a coherency of order, and a rule of 'single' direction, the 'rule' being that the progressions are 'all inward' from the mean of the Moon's orbit. CONTAINED ECCENTRICITY AND A SINGLE REFERENCING CONSTANT INITIATING LOCAL DISTANCES Negative scale of values, and rule of ordered numbers, only appear as shown above, when each of the sets is described from short to longer distance from the Sun, for all four of the different 'eclipser' objects that each form a set of 3 focal lens, with 1 diameter as the real distance actually moved in action. (Excluding Mars - the 5th system). The quantum numbers specifically denote offset unit variables in flexing, as termed offset from the Moon's Mean of orbit, which is a single referencing constant that is hard wired in the systems and serves as a single determinent for precisely quantifying the locations. Without this single locator used as a constant frame of reference for recognizing uniqueness in distances from eyepiece to focal lens, all of the eclipse states would just show a simple flex, maximized merely as a diameter of a known object, per system, and no unique quantum numbers for each set would be recognizable. There would be no logic, there would be no big group comprising the complete tally of quantum numbers which combines to produce one easy and self evident but large ranging insight (like seeing atomic spectrum of hydrogen all in one view). Accepting the Moon Mean of orbit as an inherent constant completely opens up a new view within the focal lens mechanics to reveal the quantum numbers, in sudden insight. The insight is clear in that the quantum numbers form a single lineal series. The coherent set of ordered numbers progresses in a single straight line of values, revealing another quantum certainty, as shown immediately below. The name of the planet shown is for each etheric body that fits the unit integer 'gaps' of actual action in the flexes along the focal lens' line of sight, as follows: IDEOGRAM 1 INCREMENTAL DISTANCES TO FOCAL LENS LOCATIONS (THE QUANTUM CERTAINTY) A single lineal series of quantum numbers; the planet named is the leap in space which fits the flex gaps: planet radii | - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 .... moon mean orbit | [ VENUS ] --------- | [MERCURY] | + 1 moon radius --------- | [ MOON ] | + 1 moon radius planet --------- | diameters [ EARTH ] --------| | - 5 ...... [ MARS ] ............. + 3 2 diameters 2 diameters AN ABSENT VENUS POLAR RADIUS In the - 2 - 1 - 0 number set, Earth eclipsing the Sun in Venus at longest distance from the eyepiece, (at Venus Perihelion of orbit), is a Polar sized Earth, sitting right at the Mean orbit of the Moon. In this instance a Polar sized Venus does not appear anywhere in the flex gaps. Only two focal 'gaps' of the size of Venus are able to appear in terms offset from the Moon's Mean of orbit, instead of a full set of three flex 'gaps' for the other focal 'objects' found in each of the other sets. HYPERFINE DISTINCTION The sizes of all measures involved in the empirical states for EARTH-MOON-SUN listed in TABLE 3, (shown further below) uniformly morph from shorter to longer measures, whereas all states listed in TABLES 1, 2, and 4, have focal lens parts which morph from longer to shorter measures, when the eccentricic distances to the target are listed short to longest. In this case, the resulting gravitational quantum 'hyperfine' features are reversed in progression of focal lens flex terms for purely metaphysical systems vrs the one empirical (Earth-Moon-sun) total eclipse system. NO HYPERFINE CONSTANCY Mars has a functional system synonymous to an empirical system, in that an organized uniform progression in all parts proceeds as a moving camp, a pattern uniformly progressing from one size to the next. Thus it is identical to the uniform EARTH-MOON-SUN empirical structure. So 'hyperfine' distinction is not a law that is rigorously usable to predict or identify 'etheric' vrs 'empirical' states. MARS Mars is different. Its quantum numbers do not order 1 plus 1, not in the same way as do the other states which all have a progressive lineup of holes in space representing overlaying slice-sized diameters to produce a single succinct tally of quantally counted radii increments that progress in a 1 + 1 + 1 rigorous lineal order (rather than 1 x 1 x 1 gravitational order). Mars is not within the tally. In order for Mars to be intrinsically within the tally, two more sets of perfect eclipse states are needed, one having quantum numbers - 1 0 + 1, and the other 0 +1 +2. These are not seen. Nor are any other possible tally arrays seen. Instead, Mars has quantum numbers - 5 - 1 + 3 which present quite a different picture compared to the 4 other definative sets of states. For instance, 2 Mars diameters comprise each flex gap that Mars leaps between states as a focal lens. And the Mars focal lens array per se stradles the Moon's mean of orbit, offset by one radii of Mars toward the eyepiece. This is not suprising, since Mars' perfect eclipse states are in a virtual symmetry position focused in opposite direction, away from the center of the solar system, with Earth orbit marking the switch in window. This 'something different' drives the focusing manner of the Mars' re-orientated system, however the out-of-sequence focusing manner for Mars is just a surprise, there is no unreconcilable spoiler, here. Otherwise, Mars also perfectly focuses in perfect eclipse states over longer eccentricic distances that are still definable by quantum numbers. Mars also obeys three conditions for all perfect eclipse states, itemized further below as 'embodiments' under 'GENERAL SUMMARY'. Here are Mars quantum numbers for its set of perfect eclipse states, in terms of whole inter unit multiples of the Radii of Mars: MARS QUANTUM NUMBERS TWO MARS DIAMETERS IN EACH FLEX GAP | | | | | 4 x mars | 4 x mars | ... radii |............|............| | | ....... moon mean orbit | eyepiece ...... - 5 -1 | + 3 Polar Average Equatorial |............| two Mars diameters comprising (Polar plus Average sizes) |............| two Mars diameters comprising (Average plus Equatorial sizes) The 'two Mars diameters' are more correctly percieved as joint pairs, one of Polar diameter plus one everaged diameter, the second pair is one Equatorial diameter plus one averaged diameter. In this regard, Mars is a perfect eclipses system featuring quantistically flexed diameters rather than quantisitically flexed radii. As you can see, the MARS set of quantum numbers shows a different orchestration in how the Mars slices of space are formed in etheric images. full complete | terran OVERALL -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -0 +3 numbers | 16 quantum numbers representing unit distances offset from the Moon's Mean of orbit, reveal a progressive order in short to long distances from the observer to the focal lens, becoming lineal as shown, -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -0 (and + 3 for Mars), when all of the targeting views are ordered systematically from short to longer eccentricic distances, in comparing the perfect eclipse states one then another for each of the systems in one complete collection of states, where a single unifying theme is used. The 16 quantum numbers are 15 in 3 numbers each for 5 systems = 15, plus the Moon's mean of orbit = 16. The 'theme' is; distance to target is composed in progression of short to long eccentricity for every system. Eccentricity 'distance' progression is the unifying theme that links all states together into a single long string, coupling all states together in a characteristic lineal progression of quantum numbers. Eccentricity is systematically progressed from Perihelion to the Aphelion line-up positions. In this point of view, the quantum numbers gell into a rigorous lineal order, all relative to the Moon's MEAN of orbit. Remember to keep your head on straight. Although the circles and spheres and the datas points of center are depicted side by side in flat space (2 dimensional) in representations herein, in actual space the circles and spheres line up like targets along an axis from Mars to the Sun at the center of the solar system. The intrinsic point of view is a series of full cross sectional diameters at right angles to the line of sight (across the line of sight) at right angles like lenses in both telescopes and microscopes. In full intrinsic nature, transparent soap bubbles are stationed like beads along an invisible straight line. HALF UNITS (DIAMETERS) The whole integer series of quantum numbers appears only when RADII of planet images are used as the measures of flex gap increments. But in fact planet image DIAMETERS are the actual gaps flexed. Since only three points actually define a movement of a focal lens within flex gaps, diameters can also be used to show properties, since just one sphere will then be shown fitting snuggly in place, along with slightly blurred math. However, diameter quantum numbers cannot show 'hyperfine distinctions' of Polar vrs Equatorial kind in the flex gaps. Diameters yield 1/2 unit quantum numbers, a more unweildy system. How the quantum numbers might look when presenting spherical diameters in the gaps (rather than lineal radii), is as follows: Radii | EARTH) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 (SUN | Diameters | EARTH) -5/2 -2 -3/2 -1 -1/2 0 +1/2 +1 +3/2 (SUN | Table 1 |___________| 1 x Venus Mean Diameter Table 2 |___________| 1 x Merc Mean Diameter Table 3 |___________| 1 x Earth Mean Diameter Table 4 |___________| 1 x Venus ean Diameter | Table 5 - |___________:___________|___________:__________| + 2 x Mars diameters 2 x Mars diameters The Mars diameter spheres are not of Averaged size. The (-) sphere is of (polar plus average) diameters. The (+) sphere is of (average plus equatorial) diameters. TABLES TABLES 1 to 5, following immediately below the GENERAL SUMMARY, show a complete set of datas for all states, in a uniformly systematic compilation of quantum eclipse states, HYPERFINE radii, and other facts. GENERAL SUMMARY It is obvious by now, that a single steady state system of perfect eclipse states, seen at once in a single image in the mind's eye, in abstract space perceived by manipulation of geometry parts, or as a collection of systematically arrayed quantum numbers with many inner secrets embodied, in which the many mechanical manners of the focal lens parts are seen without question in self evident truth, becomes a very wordy toy when trying to describe the mechanically active parts by words and definational accounts. Not even thought experiements can keep the picture abundantly clear. Nevertheless, words can help. Lets continue. An existence of quantizating in solar gravity is manifesting in the form of many eclipse states definable in principles of behavior illuminating the occurrence of common properties featured in ordered arrays, all of lineal sum kind. The quantized manifestations are steady state, and include complete veracity in planetary eccentricities in the solar terran region. The planetary eccentricities are not random in particular since the eccentricities deal inclusivly only the Perihelion and Aphelion terms in planetary orbits around. the Sun. The quantum gravity states feature recurring images comprising fundamental solar constants appearing in self same size, in more than one embodiment, representing three different natures in the properties of gravitational image manifestations. 1. Real bodies (orbiting terran planets and the Moon) 2. As eclipsing lenses (echoes in orbit as moons) 3. Flex gap intervals (distance in/out for focusing) All terran planets recurr imaged in these 3 ways. - Finis -