Tables and datas ------------------------------------------------ | QUANTUM GRAVITY EXISTS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM | |______________________________________________| Planet oblate radii are properties created as images formed in pure mechanical principles. Planet radii are not random incidences with no image clone cause. Pure mechanical images are housed in two structural forms of apparatus. One has embodiments of a telescope's focusing and viewing system, the other apparatus has the embodiments of a microscope focusing and viewing system. Each apparatus incorporates a different way of viewing the Sun, using an identical local structuring for behavior of focal lens parts. The structure of the focal lens actually 'flexes' in two unique ways; in 'size' as a focal lens object; and in incremental displacement 'locations' for the focal lens object itself. More quantizing in gravity inherently exists in the form of precise 'hyperfine' distinctions, in which radii of planets exist in finite sizes that are fundamental solar constants. Each radii turns up in more than one fundamental embodiment. Recurrances of radii, occur in three different forms of mechanical embodiments, as constants. To repeat: THE EMBODIMENTS ARE: 1 Planet entity as a BODY in dynamic orbit. 2 Planet image as an ECLIPSING focal lens. 3 Planet image as a MARKER defining maximum eclipsing focal lens SHIFT displacements to elegant LOCATIONS. In its quantum gravity structure, the Moon of Earth correctly occurs in the three embodiments, in which the Moon, as a body in orbit, is also the image of the flexing focal lens, and is also an increment of displacement in the location of the focal lens (a gap) in place at precise distance out from the observer 'eyepiece'. Four other systems of quantum gravity eclipse systems do not have solid bodies, so are not uniquely self systained and do not appear in an empirical form. The Moon of earth is uniquely self contained as a recurrance of its three embodiments. It is observable as an empirical dynamic system whose quantum properties cannot be seen by the naked eye due to obstacles such as the solidness of the Moon, slightly variating velocities, and chaos in the dynamic system in the manner of orbital tilts, plus random spurious kicks given to annual eccentricities, by gravity in yearly passes with other planets including Jupiter and Saturn. When questions of mass, velocity, orbital tilt, and spurious gravity kicks are removed from the only empirical dynamic system, the pure understructure of the system is revealed by straight line perception of center points lined up to comprise superimposing images in full cross sectional diameters, and becomes coupled to four other eclipsing systems with similar quantum natures for all five systems. TERRAN ECCENTRICITY Terran planet eccentricities are intrinsically connected. The precise amount of eccentricity creates defined states of quantal nature in focal lens 'structures' built of fundamental sets of planet radii constants. The Mean orbit of the Earth's Moon is a single constant, contained within all quantum eclipse states, which 'references' the location of a focal lens for each and every given perfect eclipse state. The Moon orbit is embodied as a single constant to house planet radii in intrinsically connected terran planet eccentricities. No other eclipse states, other than those which are readily seen to be distinctly 'quantal', are possible in the intrinsically connected orbiting systems of terran planets, at least so far as herein found by me. (See HOLES.TXT in the ECLIPSE.HTM main menu for quantal 'perfect eclipses' involving Jupiter and Saturn). Since each possible eclipse state is created from constants whose existence is perfect, such states can be called 'perfect eclipses', to distinguish them from co-incidental total solar eclipses whose cause seems occurred (but is not) from original randomness and so the randomness has been concidered just co-incidentally merely amazing. It can be assumed that inherent limitations in the number of planets, and their intrinsically connected eccentricities, inhibit greater chaotic randomness from occuring in the terran region of space. Which brings the final perception right back to a finite set of non random events exclusively arrised from quantum principles in gravity. TABLES Here are the final exams, a set of five tables, each depicting quantum highlights of one set of 3 eclipse states, a set for each of the 5 systems. _________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------- ###################### FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS ####################### ----------------------------------------------------------------- |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | PHYSICAL CONSTANT DATAS 1.00 x 10 to power 13 cms | | MO Moon mean of orbit = .oo3844 01 | | MO+ Moon mean 'adjusted' = .oo3845 78766010 | | SunR Sun radius = .oo6962 65 | | EO Earth orbit = 1.495979 27 astronomical unit | | | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | ECCENTRICITIES OF ORBITS Empirical | | | | EA.....EARTH Aphelion ...... = 1.5209 95035 x 10 to 13 cms | | EO Mean = 1.4959 79270 | | EP Perihelion = 1.4709 63504 Moon radii | | VA.... VENUS Aphelion ..... = 1.0894 33439 | | VO Mean = 1.0820 89677 EQ = .oooo1738 9 | | VP Perihelion = 1.0747 45915 AV = .oooo1738 35 | | MA... MARS Aphelion .... = 2.4922 55088 POLAR | | MO Mean = 2.2794 10149 = .oooo1737 8 | | MP Perihelion = 2.0665 65211 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENUS-VENUS-SUN TABLE 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reverse Hyperfine Distinction is reversed. Earth/Venus/Sun at Venus Parallel converse symmetry. Total gap size is 1 Averaged Venus diameter. Short FOCAL LENS CROSS SECTION MO - 5 Venus EQ U------------- x SunR = Venus EQ Venus EQUATORIAL radius EO - VA Shortest orbital MO - 4 Venus AV ------------- x SunR = Venus AV Venus AVERAGE radius EO - VO MO - 3 Venus P ------------ x SunR = Venus P Venus POLAR radius EO - VP Longest orbital Long |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1-----1----1 Earth-Venus-Venus (obverse) | | 5 4 3 Venus radii increments | | VENUS is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo6050 .oooo6065 317295 .oooo6064 109107 | | Venus radius AV .oooo6045 .oooo6059 811089 .oooo6058 877288 | | P .oooo6040 .oooo6054 331582 .oooo6053 654488 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENUS-MERCURY-SUN TABLE 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reverse Hyperfine Distinction is reversed. Venus/Mercury/Sun at Sun Slide Rule symmetry Total gap size is 1 Averaged Mercury diameter. Short FOCAL LENS CROSS SECTION MO - 4 Merc EQ + 1 Moon EQ 4 Merc est. radius ------------- x SunR = Merc EQ Mercury EQUATORIAL radius VP Shortest orbital MO - 3 Merc AV + 1 Moon AV 3 Merc est. radius ------------- x SunR = Merc AV Mercury AVERAGE radius VO MO - 2 Merc P + 1 Moon P 2 Merc est. radius ------------ x SunR = Merc P Mercury POLAR radius VA Longest orbital Long |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1----1---1--|+1moon Venus-Mercury-Sun (recurrent) Oblation | | 4 3 2 Mercury radii increments is small | | MERCURY is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo2439 .oooo2438 3710835 .oooo2438 386969 | | Mercury radius AV .oooo---- .oooo2437 5127970 .oooo2437 540961 | | P .oooo---- .oooo2436 6666608 .oooo2436 695537 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I radius of the Moon is added to the Moon Mean of orbit, then 'n' units of Mercury radii are subtacted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARTH-MOON-SUN TABLE 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Empirical Hyperfine Distinction is normal. Earth/Moon/Sun at Sun Total gap size is 1 Averaged Earth diameter. All space harmonics change uniformly. Short FOCAL LENS CROSS SECTION MO - 3 Earth P + 1 Moon P ------------- x SunR = Moon P Moon POLAR radius EP Shortest orbital MO - 2 Earth AV + 1 Moon AV -------------- x SunR = Moon AV Moon AVERAGE radius EO MO - 1 Earth EQ + 1 Moon EQ -------------- x SunR = Moon EQ Moon EQUATORIAL radius EA Longest orbital Long |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1---1--1--|+1moon Earth-Moon-Sun (physical) | | 3 2 1 Earth radii increments | | MOON is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo1738 9 .oooo1738 4330588 .oooo1738 4309114 | | Moon radius AV .oooo1738 35 .oooo1737 9145864 .oooo1737 9125504 | | P .oooo1737 8 .oooo1737 4797042 .oooo1737 4781809 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I radius of the Moon is added to the Moon Mean of orbit, then 'n' units of Earth radii are subtacted. EARTH radii = EQ = .oooo6378 164 AVE = .oooo6367 4715 POLAR = .oooo6356 779 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARTH-VENUS-SUN TABLE 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reverse Hyperfine Distinction is reversed. Earth/Earth/Sun at Venus Converse symmetry Total gap size is 1 Averaged Venus diameter. Short FOCAL LENS CROSS SECTION MO+ - 2 Venus EQ ------------- x SunR = Earth EQ Earth EQUATORIAL radius EO - VA Shortest orbital MO+ - 1 Venus AV ------------- x SunR = Earth AV Earth AVERAGE radius EO - VO MO+ - 0 Venus P ------------ x SunR = Earth P Earth POLAR radius EO - VP Longest orbital Long |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1--1-1 MO+ Earth-Earth-Venus (obverse) | | 2 1 0 moon Venus radii increments | | increment EARTH is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo6378 164 .oooo6378 7219272 .oooo6378 7219272 | | Earth radius AV .oooo6367 4715 .oooo6367 6438059 .oooo6367 6438059 | | P .oooo6356 779 .oooo6356 779oooo .oooo6356 779oooo | | same as re-iterated values | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ When using these Earth radii sizes, the oblative sizes for Venus are the same as in the 're-iterated' values of TABLE 1 immediately above for EARTH-VENUS-VENUS. MO+ is the Moon mean of orbited adjusted to be slightly longer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARTH-MARS-SUN TABLE 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Normal Hyperfine Distinction is normal. Earth/Mars/Sun at Mars Virtual converse symmetry. Total gap size is 4 Averaged Mars diameters. Short FOCAL LENS CROSS SECTION MO - 5 Mar P ------------ x SunR = Mar P Mars POLAR radius MarO - EA Shortest orbital MO - 1 Mar AV ------------- x SunR = Mar AV Mars AVERAGED radius MarO - AO MO + 3 Mar EQ ------------- x SunR = Mar EQ Mars EQUATORIAL radius MarO - EP Longest orbital Long |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | MO | | 1-----1 +++1 Earth-Mars-Mars (converse) Oblation | | - 5 -1 +3 Mars radii increments is large | | MARS is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo3396 6 .oooo3398 3660 .oooo3398 4128 | | Mars radius AV .oooo3386 65 .oooo3386 2203 .oooo3386 2241 | | P .oooo3376 7 .oooo3374 0041 .oooo3374 1224 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The Mars assembly has 4 radii units per incremental shift, rather than 1 radii unit. MO is the Moon mean of orbit. Three units of a Mars radii (shown as +++ ) appear incremented further out on the other side of the Moon's mean of orbit. ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RE-ITERATED Re-iterated means that a proportion is calculated starting by using a known input term from a table of solar Physical Constants. The result will be slightly different than the original input term. The result is then used as a new input term, resulting in a new term again altered slightly from the original input. However, the alter only goes so far, and very swiftly homes in toward a constant value in the manner of a mathematical strange attractor, a slight change continuing well into the higher digits of accuracy further to each calculation, the changes becoming so slight it does not matter. The point is, that the calculations swiftly home in on 'attractor' results that become locked-in as constants. The final constants are listed as 're-iterated' terms for the 'attractors'. Preliminary terms 'pro-tem' result from a first run of a proportion. They are given so that it can be seen how very little an input term in a proportion will actually change (already close to accurate) after first run through re-iteration, from datas taken straight from published tables of astonomy solar Physical Constants. ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OBLATENESS NOTE Oblation rate for planets is orbitally progressive. Mercury ... smallest Earth ... larger than Venus Venus ... next Mars ... largest SYMMETRIES More than one kind occurs. The Mars symmetry is local, virtual (not mirror), interfaced at the Earth. The Venus and Earth kind are also local, interfaced at the Earth, though both would seem global but are not since only the focal lens is in symmetry. The Mercury symmetry has to be called slide rule, since nothing else in the system's mechanical properties point of view is changed except for location of eyepiece and focal lens, slid inward along the solar system's ecliptic axis to Venus. SET A____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-VENUS-SUN solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = Venus EQ radius .oooo6064 10910724 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = Venus AVE radius .oooo6058 8772882 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6053 65448899 Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = Venus POLAR radius .oooo6053 65448899 |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1-----1----1 Earth-Venus-Venus (obverse) | | 5 4 3 Venus radii increments | | VENUS is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo6050 .oooo6065 317295 .oooo6064 109107 | | Venus radius AV .oooo6045 .oooo6059 811089 .oooo6058 877288 | | P .oooo6040 .oooo6054 331582 .oooo6053 654488 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SET B___________________factored datas__________________________ VENUS-MERCURY-SUN solar term .oooo1738 9 .oo3844 01 .oooo2438 38696944 Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit 1.074745915 = Mercury EQ radius .oooo2438 38696944 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1738 35 .oo3844 01 .oooo2437 540961368 Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit 1.0820995035 = Mercury AVE radius .oooo2437 540961368 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1737 8 .oo3844 01 .oooo2436 695537715 Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit 1.089433439 = Mercury POLAR radius .oooo2436 695537715 |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1----1---1--|+1moon Venus-Mercury-Sun (recurrent) Oblation | | 4 3 2 Mercury radii increments is small | | MERCURY is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo2439 .oooo2438 3710835 .oooo2438 386969 | | Mercury radius AV .oooo---- .oooo2437 5127970 .oooo2437 540961 | | P .oooo---- .oooo2436 6666608 .oooo2436 695537 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SET C____________________factored datas____________________________ EARTH-MOON-SUN targets Moon EQ .oooo1738 9 Moon AVE .oooo1738 35 Moon POLAR .oooo1737 8 solar term .oo384401 .oooo1738 43091148 .oooo6378 164 MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH aphelion = moon EQUATORIAL radius 1.520995035 .oooo1738 43091148 | low .oo384401 .oooo1737 91255047 .oooo6367 4715 MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH mean (semimajor) = moon AVERAGE radius 1.49597927 .oooo1737 91255047 | low .oo384401 .oooo1737 47818096 .oooo6356 779 MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH perihelion = moon POLAR radius 1.470963504 .oooo1737 47818096 | low |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1---1--1--|+1moon Earth-Moon-Sun (physical) | | 3 2 1 Earth radii increments | | MOON is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo1738 9 .oooo1738 4330588 .oooo1738 4309114 | | Moon radius AV .oooo1738 35 .oooo1737 9145864 .oooo1737 9125504 | | P .oooo1737 8 .oooo1737 4797042 .oooo1737 4781809 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SET D____________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN Venus terms are from SET A. solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = Earth EQ radius .oooo6375 67744262 | low target .oooo6378 164 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = Earth AVE radius .oooo6364 65334053 | low target .oooo6367 4715 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = Earth POLAR radius .oooo6353 8406702 | low target .oooo6356 779 |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1--1-1 MO+ Earth-Earth-Venus (obverse) | | 2 1 0 moon Venus radii increments | | increment EARTH is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo6378 164 .oooo6378 7219272 .oooo6378 7219272 | | Earth radius AV .oooo6367 4715 .oooo6367 6438059 .oooo6367 6438059 | | P .oooo6356 779 .oooo6356 779oooo .oooo6356 779oooo | | same as re-iterated values | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SET D-A__________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN using an adjusted Moon radius adjusted (derived) term .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = Earth EQ radius .oooo6378 72192720 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = Earth AVE radius .oooo6367 64380594 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3845 78766010 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = Earth POLAR radius .oooo6356 779 no change |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | 1--1-1 MO+ Earth-Earth-Venus (obverse) | | 2 1 0 moon Venus radii increments | | increment EARTH is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo6378 164 .oooo6378 7219272 .oooo6378 7219272 | | Earth radius AV .oooo6367 4715 .oooo6367 6438059 .oooo6367 6438059 | | P .oooo6356 779 .oooo6356 779oooo .oooo6356 779oooo | | same as re-iterated values | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SET D-B__________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN showing 'tags' on Earth's orbit Venus terms from SET A. solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion)) 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 1.089433439 = Earth EQ radius .oooo6376 67785866 | low *----------------------------------------------------- Mercury term from SET B. .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mercury EQ)) - Venus mean 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo2438 38696944 = Earth AVE radius .oooo6366 00940859 | low *----------------------------------------------------- Mars term from SET E. .oo3844 01 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mars EQ)) - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo3398 412892451 1.074745915 = Earth POLAR radius .oooo6355 51370136 | low SET E____________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-MARS-SUN solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo3374 12243952 Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth apehlion 2.279410149 1.520995035 = Mars POLAR radius .oooo3374 12243953 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo3386 22410792 Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth mean 2.279410149 1.49597927 = Mars AVE radius .oooo3386 22410792 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo3398 412892449 Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth perihelion 2.279410149 1.470963504 = Mars EQ radius .oooo3398 412892451 |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Incremental shifts | | | | MO | | 1-----1 +++1 Earth-Mars-Mars (converse) Oblation | | - 5 -1 +3 Mars radii increments is large | | MARS is the focal lens | |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| | Radii Data | | empirical pro tem re-iterated | | | | EQ .oooo3396 6 .oooo3398 3660 .oooo3398 4128 | | Mars radius AV .oooo3386 65 .oooo3386 2203 .oooo3386 2241 | | P .oooo3376 7 .oooo3374 0041 .oooo3374 1224 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ____________________________________________________________________ AND FINALLY HERE ARE THE SAME DATA SETS IN PURE ASKME FORM (NO DIGITS, FUNCTIONS ONLY) ____________________________________________________________________ Anyone can use their own datas and data tables to see what they can come up with either better or worse using the naked shells tabled below in this final set. -------------------------------------- TERRAN REGION ONE FINAL TIME naked artifacts -------------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________ SET X-1____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-VENUS-SUN common term Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = Venus EQ radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = Venus AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = Venus POLAR radius 3 Venus radii as input variable, are re-iterated with 1 Venus radii as end term, to home in (strange attractor) to a constant value. _____________________________________________________________ SET X-2_____________________factored datas__________________________ VENUS-MERCURY-SUN common term Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit = Mercury EQ radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit = Mercury AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit = Mercury POLAR radius _____________________________________________________________ SET X-3_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MOON-SUN common term MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = Moon EQUATORIAL radius *----------------------------------------------------- MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = Moon AVERAGE radius *----------------------------------------------------- MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = Moon POLAR radius In case you fell asleep at the last bang, this is the same structure otherwise known as the famed total solar eclipses of the Sun, except those solid eclipses (only one, and parallax), are thought to be co-incidental, whereas these three straight liners are all perfect, because they are not solid, they are holes in space, including the Sun which is cut in half like an orange, with multiple Moons all cut in half like grapes, and multiple Earths filling the flex gaps like conjoined light bubbles, the overlaying cores quite a sight, in particular the Sun, because everything is transparent. Looking up the center line would be like looking up a telepathic telescopic. Like looking into one of the hallowed halls of Reality. In mind's eye see a cube and sphere (six sided outline) with a star of david inside as a housing which holds the artifacts stable. SEE, WHAT YOU HAVE HERE, ARE ENERGY FORMS WHICH HAVE NO INERTIA. _____________________________________________________________ SET X-4____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN In this attempt, radii for Venus are too low, when re-iteration is for Venus radii as flex gaps, using known Earth radii for the focal lenses. common term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ (low) ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = Earth EQ radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE (too low) ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = Earth AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = Earth POLAR radius ___________________________________________________________ SET X-4-A__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN using an adjusted Moon orbit adjusted (derived) term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = Earth EQ radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = Earth AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- adjusted (derived) term Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = Earth POLAR radius This state, using an original Earth POLAR value, is used to arrive at an 'adjusted' Moon orbit. ___________________________________________________________ SET X-4-B__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN showing 'tags' on the Earth orbit common term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion)) = Earth EQ radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mercury EQ)) - Venus mean = Earth AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mars EQ)) - Venus perihelion = Earth POLAR radius _____________________________________________________________ SET X-5_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MARS-SUN common term Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth apehlion = Mars POLAR radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth mean = Mars AVE radius *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth perihelion = Mars EQ radius Tables finished. REMARKS Two fundamental 'Dualities' are easily summarized. 1. A mathematical 'Duality' is intrinsic where pure 'ratio proportions' cannot distinguish what kind of 'trigonometry' (parallax or center-line) point of view in being imaged when factoring of datas, even though each of the 'ratio proportions' uses identical datas for either of the two trigonometric views because of the mathematical 'Duality'. 2. A system 'Duality' is inherent in that neither trigonometry, nor ratio proportions, can tell what kind of a 'mechanical' system (microscope or telescopic) is being described by the datas being factored in the trigonometry vrs 'ratio proportions' Duality. Without the whole 'system' being embodied in view within a single external frame of reference, the nature of the mechanical system is hidden, because of the mechanical 'Duality'. 3. Without a simplified mathematical system (for instance ratio proportions), perfect eclipse states remain hidden, unless a straight line view of percieving eclipses along a 'center-line' is recognized and adopted as fundamentally a second form of trigonometry besides 'parallax' sightings. Or else, 'ratio proportions' are independently used to arrive at the same conclusions, inevitably, as those found by 'center-line' (isosceles triangle) trigonometry. CONCLUSION The finals are already here, in the blueprints of Creation. Accretion by gravity obviously had something to say about forming this solar system. It is apparent that something more fundamental, more there all along, has formed the final outer picture of just how the formation took final shaping in space, the shape we now see as the solar system's inner regions near the Sun. This is the so-called 'terran' region of solar space, which houses a unique set of small hard fast travelling planets close to the Sun, compared to the distance to Jupiter and its gas giant thin density size, and similarly for the remaining outer planets (except for Pluto). Definately in the 'terran' region, different tones in gravity are sounding loud and clear. The Will Action and Desire of the Supreme Creators Alpha and Omega, can be seen behind it all. God did not play pin ball with THIS solar system! COMMENT 1 The solar Physical Constants datas used to describe these conclusions came from detailed astronomy datas supplied to others in 1980 by astronomers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. I have used them because I have not been able to find since such a simple yet complete and comprehensively integrated total set of solar Physical Constants as were those released in 1980 by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The datas were released in a publication by space artist Don Dixon (1981), who achnowledges professional help from a host of noted astronomers around the world. GM. COMMENT 2 THE 'ATTRACTOR EQUATIONS' The existence of 'attractor equations' cannot be ignored. Even if the values of input ingredients, such as the Earth's eccentricity, the eccentricty of Venus, or the size of the radius of the Sun, or the Mean orbit of the Earth's Moon, were changed - stretched to near unreasonable lengths, the 'attractors' would still home in on reasonable representations of certain fixed known physical constants and embodiments within the solar system, which would remain unchallenged. There can be nothing else that can fit the bill. For instance concider how far you might stretch the orbit of Venus until another object replaced Mercury as a focal lens object. Very very far will be the stretch, too far to be reasonable. You would either have to throw Venus right out of orbit and find a new one, for instance all the way out to Earth to accomodate the next smallest solar body, the Earth's Moon in fact, already used to form perfect and total solar eclipses at Earth, or flex Venus's eccentricity to a vigorously beaten bolo ball range to find another object besides Mercury to fit as 'flex' in the slots the Mercury sized focal lens object leap frogs to form perfect eclipses. Well, actually, I lied. 'Io', the smallest major Moon of Jupiter, would come into focus slightly on the inside sunward side of the orbit of the Earth. But. Ummmmm. First question is what kind of hard solid 'terran-like' body or 'major moon' would, according to 'attractor equations', have exactly the right size to fit incrementally in the 'flex' gaps for 'Io', if any known body can fit that particular gap. None. Yeah. Whoah. Ummmmm. For that matter, Jupiter's three other 'major moons' Callisto, Europa, and Ganymede, could all operate as a focal lens; moon Callisto being a tiny bit smaller than Mercury would fit at Venus a little closer in than Mercury, while Ganymede might fit, but well outside of the Moon's mean of orbit at Venus, while Europa would need to be in local orbit around a point of observation well beyond Earth if used in an eclipse from Earth. Hold the barks. There is also Titan of Saturn, slightly smaller than Ganymede, and Triton of Neptune, smaller than Mercury. A perfect eclipse does not exist unless all parts of the focal lens apparatus fit knit together interlinking like tops and ballbearings in tolerances allowing no room for error. So, perhaps the outer 'major' moons fit in a picture, but it will be different than the picture which precisely describes the inner terran region of solar space. For instance, the Moon's mean of orbit may not be a constant to which outer 'Major' moons are sighted by an observer at a planetary orbit's data point (Perihelion, Mean, and Aphelion of orbit). The 'attractor equations' are attractor formulas of self contained veracity. They are nothing else but the simple ratios proportions presented above in TABLES 1 to 5. Other 'attractor equations' for the outer major moons could be different, if such equations exist for them. So far, I have not seen equations for any other moons. GM. COMMENT 3 In fundamental particle physics there must be 'Duality' states of synomous mechanical kind, not seen in true mechanical nature due to the existence of 'Duality' per se. In the solar system the problem is not so severe in fact not severe at all because it is possible to just take a mere look to see what is out there in space, or to see what is diagrammed as a complete image on a large wall in a laboratory, taking the laboratory wall diagram from what can be seen in macrocosmic size as outer space, or modelled upon ideas based on semi microcosmic hyperfine structures recognized by simply looking directly into terran space in the solar system, and fine tuning your circular slide rule. __________________________________________________________________ Values below indicated as 'Year 2000' were found on Internet site: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetary_home.html Let's start with predicted polar and equatorial radii of Mercury, as calculated in 'perfect eclipses' as proportionate ratio equations shown in TABLE 2 further below, and again in SET B further below. Next are new Mercury radii values obtained via proximity satellites circ. July 2000, which indicate degree of flattening as yet unknown for a Mercury mean radius of 2439.7 km. year 2000 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo2439.7 .oooo2438 386969 Mercury radius AVERAGE .oooo2439.7 .oooo2437 540961 POLAR .oooo2439.7 .oooo2436 695537 Mercury flattening not indicated in year 2000 The JPL datas from 1981 lists no Mercury flattening, shown next. JPL 1981 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo2439 .oooo2438 386969 Mercury radius AVERAGE .oooo---- .oooo2437 540961 POLAR .oooo---- .oooo2436 695537 blank means unknown as of 1981 The same URL reference source shows degree of flattening for Venus also currently unknown, listing a Venus mean radius of 6051.8 km. Venus perfect eclipse values are listed in TABLE 1, and also SET A. year 2000 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo6051.8 .oooo6064 109107 Venus radius AVERAGE .oooo6051.8 .oooo6058 877288 POLAR .oooo6051.8 .oooo6053 654488 Venus flattening not indicated in year 2000 The year 2000 data for Venus is slightly larger compared to JPL datas from 1981, (which indicate an approximate flattening, shown next). JPL 1981 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo6050 .oooo6064 109107 Venus radius AVERAGE .oooo6045 .oooo6058 877288 POLAR .oooo6040 .oooo6053 654488 The same URL reference source shows degree of flattening for Earth. Earth perfect eclipse values are listed in TABLE 4, and also SET D. year 2000 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo6378.1 .oooo6378 7219272 Earth radius AVERAGE .oooo6367.45 .oooo6367 6438059 POLAR .oooo6356.8 .oooo6356 779oooo The year 2000 datas for Earth are slightly clipped compared to JPL datas from 1981, shown next. JPL 1981 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo6378 164 .oooo6378 7219272 Earth radius AVERAGE .oooo6367 4715 .oooo6367 6438059 POLAR .oooo6356 779 .oooo6356 779oooo The same reference source shows degree of flattening for Mars. Mars perfect eclipse values are listed in TABLE 5, and also SET E. year 2000 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo3397 .oooo3398 4128 Mars radius AVERAGE .oooo3386 .oooo3386 2241 POLAR .oooo3375 .oooo3374 1224 JPL 1981 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo3396 6 .oooo3398 4128 Mars radius AVERAGE .oooo3386 65 .oooo3386 2241 POLAR .oooo3376 7 .oooo3374 1224 The same reference source shows degree of flattening for the Moon. Moon perfect eclipse values are listed in TABLE 3, and also SET C. year 2000 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo1737.4 .oooo1738 4309114 Moon radius AVERAGE .oooo1737.4 .oooo1737 9125504 POLAR .oooo1737.4 .oooo1737 4781809 Moon flattening not indicated in year 2000 The JPL datas from 1981 lists some Moon flattening, shown next. JPL 1981 data perfect eclipse values EQUATOR .oooo1738 9 .oooo1738 4309114 Moon radius AVERAGE .oooo1738 35 .oooo1737 9125504 POLAR .oooo1737 8 .oooo1737 4781809 ____________________________________________________________________ - Finis -