HYPERFINE DISTINCTIONS Hyperfine distinctions can have two meanings. The first has already been discussed ad nauseum, this being the 'flex' itself of each of the 'moon' bodies perfectly eclipsing the Sun, as well as a similar flexing in each gap when 'moon' bodies shift in a quantistic way to accomodate perfect eclipses at differing long distance positions of either the target (Sun) moving in and out in the mechanics of a microscope, or the eyepiece of a telescope moving in and out to focus on the Sun as a target at the solar system's empirical center. Do not forget, that all of the 'hyper fine distinctions' we have been discussing are the polar and equatorial radii of each of the planetary bodies involved, these are not the kind of datas which come merely from parallax views of total solar eclipses involving the Earth and the Moon at any of the times and seasons at which these experientially visible eclipses occur (you watch with smoky glasses, and see the diamond necklace all of a sudden). For elements in causality and fundamentals, ignore personally watched total eclipses, these, these 'normal' celestial clocktime eclipses do not have any 'hyper fine distinction'. Somethings occurred first, to spread out and become one of the manifestations (a thermodynamic, involving motions and masses - these being what are seen every so often as a total solar eclipse). The eclipses which have 'hyper fine distinction' are 'perfect' but cannot occur in a 'normal' way except by deeming the planets, the Moon, and the Sun, as transparent, and echos of the planets and Sun occur in massless states in other than their hardwired thermodynamic locations. Concider how sound can project, or be projected, even around corners, so that a rock and roll band can be heard playing loud and clear where there is no physical band, not even stereo loudspeakers. A big band plays swing, you can hear the trumpet, hear the drums, distinctly there yet dislocated in free space. Looking there to the source of the noise, nothing to see, nothing physically solid is there except vibrating molecules of something else not trumpet metal or the shells of drums. A SECOND FORM OF HYPER FINE DISTINCTION A second form of Hyperfine Distinction can be introduced as something that is needed to get one of the systems which have conjoint identicalness in its flexings to balance perfectly in all ways through its harmonic parts. Like the Venus-MERCURY-Sun system, whose outstanding quantum feature is that all radii are alike, all relate to the size of Mercury, the Earth-VENUS-Venus system also has outstanding quantum similarity in its total of conjoint radii. This quantum similarity in radii can be given the identification 'conjoint' or, 'conjointness', for the mechanical property of 'flex' in the focal lens for a system, and its leap-frogging gaps in space. For instance, in discussing the conjointness of the 'Earth-EARTH-Venus' system, the following must be understood: The Moon's mean of orbit requires an extremely small increase, for the radii of each space object comprising 'Venus' hopscoth flexing at Earth to come into a sharp focus, with both groups of radii flex having the same values; Earth radii for the focal lens eclipser, as well as the same sized 'gaps' the focal lens hopscotches along; to form a set of 3 perfect eclipse states. The slight adjust to increase the size of the Moon's Mean of orbit is actually very minor, yet it is calculatable. This single variable can cause both groups (comprising all together six basic radii) to converge to equalities, where the radii of one group, and the other, both become sets of datas already known by keen study with telescopes and space craft. The variable is in the active Mean orbit of the moon, where the eclipses actually occur displaced from the Moon's Mean of orbit. For example, when first balancing the 'ratio proportions' used to analyze a body the size of Venus at Earth, the radius size calculated for Venus as a focal lens was not quite the same as the radii size for Venus spectrified as gap lengths along the sight line when Earth is the focal lens. In order to get the two sets of datas to merge into one, requires that a minute difference be added to the mean orbit of the Moon. The difference is tiny. It is in the range of having a radius approximating Phoebos (the bigger moon of Mars of 13.5 Km), added. But actually add a little larger, roughly add about 17.7 Kilometers, practically nothing, added to the Moon's mean of orbit at Earth, and holes the size of Venus strung out from Earth will fit together in all ways tight. In fact if you want to get esoteric beyond belief, just merge the two Moons of Mars together, and the resulting radius will be about the right size to adjust the orbit of the Moon. That is how small the adjustment you have to make, is. Yet the adjustment works. But, six more empty holes filled with explicit character in space? An analogy is at hand when a liguid turns to vapor, holes of exact sizes can expand from nothing when pressure is released. For instance think of holes expanding into view in a liquid hydrogen bubble chamber when the bubble chamber is explosively decompressed at the instant charged elementary particles are experimentally fired at relativistic velocities into the chamber. The two sets of Venus datas balance right away, come into merge as identical results, with the original set of datas for Venus stemming from the Earth-VENUS-Sun symmetry. All three data sets become identical, by adjusting the orbit of the moon ever so discretely in a single hyperfine way for Earth-EARTH-Venus perfect eclipses. In coming back to the nature of the conjoint flexing system involving Venus at Earth; again, it is apparent that the two kinds of 'flex' radii for Venus are not exactly the same at first. So, adjustments are incrementally made to the Moon's Mean of orbit to check this out, and it is found that the two ranges of values converge, by increasing the Moon rest state orbit by a tiny amount, and hark, the two sets of flex gap radii for Venus become one. Who knows at this moment what accounts for the ultra hyperfine structural change in the length of the Moon's mean of orbit, to cause the radii exactitudes to appear as finished manifestations. Probably something to do with something about gravity, either Newtonian, or relativistically accomodated because of the Sun's rest state gravity. Something is there, like sonic tones, deep within the works, notwithstanding or otherwise, something is in the works. Perhaps minor chaos finally rears its head. It might just be input datas slightly out of whack, not worked out correctly for instance in regard to the radius of the Sun. It might be nothing more than a bit of chaos. In any case, at the moment, the minor adjustment is there, and works. It comes down to a raw question, which is, is empty space out there surrounding a planet really empty. Well in fact it is not, it is saturated with gravitational field density, in fact. It is not, in the raw sense, totally empty. There is more to say about this further on. In the meantime: THE HOMING-IN LAW OF STRANGE ATTRACTORS One last detail has to be stated as an insight of notice in order to be totally honest about perfect eclipse states: but the honesty is no problem at all because of what it honors. The honor is in noticing a fundamental change in the mechanics of behaviors of the two basically different manifestations of 5 Terran region eclipse systems so far found to be 'perfect'. In a quick list, there are 5 different systems involved as of this moment in time, each system having a set of 3 perfect eclipse states, distinctified by the nature of each state's particular flexing of its focal lens, which includes a set of quantum numbers for each set of 3 states within each system. Four systems are turned inward toward the solar center, the fifth system (Mars) is turned outward, Earth orbit the border where the view window changes direction from inward, to outward. Only one system is empirical, this of course happens to be good old Sol the Sun, vanishing behind the Moon periodically, or rather, good old Luna drifting casually in front of the Sun from time to time, to form co-incidental total solar eclipses. When this only empirical system is translated into perfect eclipses by the simple expediency of switching the hypontenuse and altitudes of all of the right angle triangles that form the parallax geometry humans use to see the eclipses, then, and only then, does hyperfine distinction become apparent, in which, for instance, flexing of the size of the Moon progresses from one radii size to the next, as the Earth carrying the Moon with it moves from closer in to farther out, say, in accord with repeating eccentricity positions of the Earth's orbit seen as 'steady state constants' perihelion and Aphelion orbitals, over eons of time. A local progression, of one radii size to another as seen for the flex size of the Moon sized focal lens, say smaller to larger, is synonymously seen for the Earth in the gaps the Moon leaps, where the size of Earth is seen to fit exactly in the distance the Moon moves in total to form its set of three perfect eclipse states. The flexing progression is in the same direction, ie smaller to larger, for the (etheric) Earth, which fills the gaps perfectly. METPHAPHYSICAL VRS PHYSICAL However, in dealing with the other four sets of perfect eclipse states existing in the Terran region, it is obvious that each of the bodies forming these other sets are not real, they are echoes, phantoms, massless, in which case you can call these other states metaphysical, because they are obviously there like intense holes in the fabrics of space in the solar system, but are not seen as constructions by gravity using solid bodies. Hence, metaphysical is what they are. All of these other states share a unique difference compared to the single empirical system which produces total solar eclipses as seen from Earth. The unique difference is that the hyperfine distinction progresses in converse order, that is, say, from larger to smaller radii, instead of from small to larger radii as is the case for the only empirical system. Intricacies of the focal lens flexing systems are reversed, in terms of progression of discrete sizes for the metaphysical structures. Neat is tidy to say the least. DISTINCT HYPERFINE PRECISION It is worth noting that the hyperfine distinctions of the metaphysical states are so precise, that changing any of the constants which form each state by even the tiniest amount can cause the hyperfine progression to instantly reverse over to the etheric form used by the one empirical structure, but also, the slightest change can cause states to start to unravel right out of focus, mathematically. In other words, all of the states, both the single empirical set of 3 states, and the four metaphysical sets of 3 states, act as strange ATTRACTORS that home in on constant values, which, in absolute size, once homed there, cannot change, because any change no matter if slight, can start to unravel the hyperfine integrety of the system. The idea that this solar system was created by random gathering in an accretion disk can be dropped like a dead turkey from a high flying helicopter. Just boot the bird out the door, one swift poot, and let accelaration kick in. The huffs of little feathers drifting around the ground from the impact explosion are the scientific theory about accretion disk randomness, exposed for what it is, poof. An example of just how little a term has to be changed (falsified) to cause an 'attractor' (perfect eclipse state) to reverse its 'hyper fine distinction', then to break down completely (unravel), is found under TABLE 4-3 and TABLE 4-4, found in DISCUSSION F-C under 'HYPER FINE NARROW RANGE and SWITCHING', in the SWITCHEROO.TXT file in the ECLIPSE.HTM home page, for a detailed example with a full set of terms. THERE IS MORE (MOON'S MEAN OF ORBIT) There is more to perfect eclipse states. For instance, each can be shown at a start point located with reference to the Moon's mean of orbit, no exception. Not Ganymede's orbit, not Tritan's, only the Moon's orbit appear in the multiple array of states herein called 'perfect eclipses'. For that matter similar results can be achieved by having distance markers originate and radiate out from the center point of the Earth, with ragging ends out in space which 'rag' in precise quantum quantities. But, that is a harder view to depict in simple mathematics. So, the Mean orbit of the Moon it is, this is a single reference point to which all 'flex locations' can be guaged. Each set of eclipses can be diagrammed starting with the focal lens at the Moon Mean of orbit and taking it from there. The initial location of the focal lens is offset, typically inward toward the eyepiece host planet, by a precise amount which is quantal by being a unit multiple of one radii for a given flexing planet's gap. As the focal lens moves, the number of radii accumulating (to a total of 3), progress in rigorously naked intervals, each whole unit interval slightly flexed in size from its nearest neighbor. Only three intervals are instrinic for each set of 3 perfect eclipse states. Such pattern is very clear cut for each set of perfect eclipse states. The complete set of unit interval numbers per se, for all sets of eclipse states, is itself very clear cut also. The whole set of quantum numbers, for the 4 inner systems (inward from the orbit of Earth), combine into a single unbroken chain of quantum numbers progressing in a lineal sum direction. A MORE ELEGANT SYSTEM - NO In truth, since a planet's mean of orbit is an average of 1/2 apehlion plus perihelion it might be concidered merely human's mental construct where then, 'perfect eclipses' only occur at constants, to wit a planet's perihelion and aphelion of orbit. But this trunkated view presents diffulties, for instance although only two circles of precise size lay side by side to comprise flex gaps along a sight line, the diameter of one sphere would have to be a composite of a polar radius plus a mean radius, and the diameter of the other sphere would have to also be a composite comprising one equator radius plus one mean radius. So, mean, (average) turns up in the master clockworks blueprint so there is no need to dispense with a planet's mean of orbit in order to achieve a more elegant more simplified system of states in fact as you can already see citing a need for radii composite constructs in the flex gap sightline, a more elegant system is not gained by dropping planet mean orbits from the terms. FOR INSTANCE For instance in the empirical case; the Earth-Moon eclipsing of the Sun; the initial location of the Moon is progressed forward from the Moon's Mean of orbit by one Moon radius of Equatorial size, but then backs across the 'Mean' line toward the eyepiece by one Earth radius of Equatorial size, with the Earth located at its Aphelion of Orbit. When the Earth is moved to its Mean of orbit, the Moon shifts inward a liitle, to flex to Averaged radius size, and leaps a gap of Averaged Earth radius size, and the size of the original + Moon radius unit changes to Averaged. And when the Earth is moved to its Perihelion of orbit, the Moon shifts inward once more and flexes to the Moon's Polar radius, leaping a gap equal to the Polar radius of Earth, and the size of the original + Moon radius unit changes to Polar. So obvious, these 3 flex changes are EXTREMELY small, yet absolutely precise. Count: when the focal lens (the Moon) moves to the second stop gap, the total interval from the Moon Mean of orbit is 2 Earth radii of Averaged size, and in moving to the third stop gap the whole interval to the Moon Mean of orbit is 3 Earth radii of Polar size, plus of course, + 1 Moon radius, now of Polar size, on the far side (outer side) of the Moon's Mean of orbit. A hyperfine distinction is very clear cut in this system. In particular all of this 'empirical' system's slices of space uniformly progress from large to small including the Earth itself in moving through long to shorter orbital distance from the Sun, to accord the Moon in perfect focus involving three unique kinds of flexes; change in both Moon's sizes, and change in the Earth-sized flex gaps. In this set of 3 states, the etheric Earth's radii flexing to fill the 3 gaps is offset inward from the Moon's mean of orbit by the progression - 1 - 2 - 3 in units that equal different radii of Earth, from 1 x EQ radius (-1), to 3 x POLAR radius (-3). Similar accountings take place for the other sets of perfect eclipse states, except the progression of changes in flexing gaps are reversed, 'flexing' from smaller to larger while progressing inward toward the eyepiece observer, as the Sun target otherwise progresses from longest, to mean, to shorter distance from the eyepiece, in reverse to the Earth Moon's empirical system of total eclipses. CHOICE OF PERCEPTION One unique single sightline vrs a disk's circumpherence. There is no cause precluding 'perfect eclipses' occurring from anywhere around the circumpherence of the solar system's ecliptic disk in space at any time. Each array of eclipse states can begin from any point on the circumpherence even on opposite sides of the solar system. By choice, 'perfect eclipses' have herein been described as occurring along a single axis called the 'sightline' but this is only as a convenience. In truth there is no limiting clause in symmetry or mechanics of space forebidding any point around the solar system's ecliptic disk from being start point for one or more arrays of 'perfect eclipse' states. - Finis -